State v. Scrivner’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2018
4 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Stanley · State v. Guthrie · 23 Ariz. App. 169 - State v. Bell · State v. Rogers · State v. McFord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the purposes of Rule 32 proceedings in Arizona 'is to furnish an evidentiary forum for the establishment of facts underlying a claim for relief when such facts have not previously been established of record.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[k]nowingly, voluntarily and intelligently not raised at trial, on appeal, or in any previous collateral proceeding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“apparent necessity for the development of these matters by further factual hearings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.