132 Cal. App. 376 - People v. Beatty’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1960
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Casey v. United States · People v. Osaki · People v. Ward · 26 Cal. App. 336 - People v. Wilson · 123 Cal. App. 299 - People v. Bullock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the right of a defendant to be confronted by witnesses is fundamental. ... The right in this state is guaranteed by section 686 of the Penal Code, and the defendant can be deprived of the same only by statutory authority to the contrary. (People v. Ward, 105 Cal. 652 [ 39 P. 33 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Giles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.