State v. Camera’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
2 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2004 · most notably State v. Aillon (1983), State v. Harris (1960)
2 district · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Oppenheimer · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Mooney v. Wabrek · State v. Gilligan · State v. Simborski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of reckless misconduct when he intentionally does an act, or fails to do an act in violation of his duty, with knowledge of the serious danger to others involved in it or of facts which would disclose that danger to a reasonable man. . . . It is `reckless indifference to the safety of others which supplies the criminal intent necessary to warrant conviction.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mahalik · State v. Egidio“reckless indifference to the safety of others which supplies the criminal intent necessary to warrant conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mahalik
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.