Schultz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2012
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2072 · 28 U.S.C. § 2101 · 41 U.S.C. § 101 (Anti-Kickback Enforcement Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Angeline Lombardo · Union Nat Bank of Wichita Kansas v. Lamb · Street v. United States · Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair · Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd. v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not necessarily indicate * * that plaintiff's petition arrived on that day [July 16] since it was the custom of the clerk's office at that time to stamp the Monday [July 16] filing date on all papers that had arrived on the previous Saturday or Sunday.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.