In re Briskman’s Empirical Analysis
132 F. 201 · 1904
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1956
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mueller v. Nugent · In re Rodgers · In re Weinger, Bergman & Co. · In re Knight · In re Breslauer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That the property of the bankrupt comes within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court upon the filing of either a voluntary or an involuntary petition is not controverted. Neither is it disputed that this court has the power to prevent a state court from exercising exclusive jurisdiction over property of a bankrupt seized subsequent to the filing of a petition in bankruptcy.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Donnelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.