Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.2d 130 - In re Kepler

In re Kepler’s Empirical Analysis

132 F.2d 130 · 1942

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
November 1971
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently November 1971 · most notably In re Libby (1958), In re Finley (1949)

5 federal appellate ·

6201942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A patent should not be granted for appellant’s discovery of a result that would flow naturally from the teachings of the prior art.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.