Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.2d 3 - Walling v. Rocklin

Walling v. Rocklin’s Empirical Analysis

132 F.2d 3 · 1942

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2015

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

5019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Calaf v. Gonzalez · 44 F. Supp. 355 - Walling v. Rocklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he occasional purchase and sale of products necessitated by reason of storms, frost, and other emergencies, caused by the natural elements as shown by the record is, we think, quite consistent with the theory that defendants are primarily and exclusively engaged in agriculture in the production of flowers, plants, flowering shrubs, ornamental grasses, etc., necessary to meet the wants of purchasers of flowers and floral designs and tributes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 641 F. Supp. 2d 1200 - Solis v. CONLEY'S NURSERY AND LANDSCAPING, INC.
  2. “* * * The nature of the work done at this shop should not, we think, be considered as segregated from the entire enterprise. Everything that is there done is `an incident to' or `in conjunction with' the agricultural enterprise which is being carried on by defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wirtz v. Tyson's Poultry, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.