Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.2d 965 - Helvering v. Smith

Helvering v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

132 F.2d 965 · 1942

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 1966
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co. · Helvering v. Rankin · Bingham v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Mahler v. Commissioner · Underwood v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, while a deduction for a loss is allowable only when it is actually”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “, a loss of either sort must be shown or proved by some”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.