Gill v. Reveley’s Empirical Analysis
132 F.2d 975 · 1943
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1970
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gunning v. Cooley · Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. · Pennsylvania Co v. Chamberlain · Slocum v. New York Life Insurance · Delaware Co v. Converse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the law of Kansas, a threat of criminal prosecution does not constitute duress and will not defeat a contract unless the person to whom the threat was made became so frightened or was placed in such fear as to over come his judgment and make it impossible for him to exercise his own free will. [Citations]” (p. 978.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hastain v. Greenbaum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.