Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.3d 1069 - Lucas v. Johnson

Lucas v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

132 F.3d 1069 · 1998

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Barrientes v. Johnson (2000), Trevino v. Johnson (1999)

44 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

650199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Coleman v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the evidence is newly discovered and was unknown to the defendant at the time of the trial; (2) the defendant’s failure to detect the evidence was not due to a lack of diligence; (3) the evidence is material, not merely cumulative or impeaching; and (4) the evidence would probably produce acquittal at a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Habeas relief is warranted [for erroneous admission of evidence] when the erroneous admission played a crucial, critical and highly significant role in the trial”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the outcome of the case is 'susceptible to debate among reasonable minds,' then the decision is not dictated by precedent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.