Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.3d 1225 - Kocher

Kocher’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2020 · most notably United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa (2010), Parino v. Fhp, Inc.

3 district · 6 state decisions

2701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis · ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · Breast Implant Tort Represented By O'Quinn v. Dow Corning Corp. · Nemaizer v. Baker · Macharia v. Hodel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “jurisdiction existed, the court stated: Kocher's claims against Dow Chemical and DuPont bear precisely the same relation to Dow Corning's bankruptcy as did the plaintiffs' claims against the nondebtor defendants in In re Dow Corning Corp. Following the rationale of that decision, it is at least arguable that Kocher's claims against Dow Chemical and DuPont conceivably could affect Dow Corning's bankruptcy estate and thus are”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A party may not use a Rule 60(b)(4) motion as a substitute for a timely appeal. In other words, if a party fails to appeal an adverse judgment and then files a Rule 60(b)(4) motion after the time permitted for an ordinary appeal has expired, the motion will not succeed merely because the same argument would have succeeded on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “succeed only if the absence of jurisdiction was so glaring as to constitute a 'total want of jurisdiction' or a 'plain usurpation of power' so as to render the judgment void from its inception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.