Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 F.3d 1287 - United States v. Apex Oil Co.

United States v. Apex Oil Co.’s Empirical Analysis

132 F.3d 1287 · 1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
November 2021
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2021

4 federal appellate ·

301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bass · McBoyle v. United States · United States v. Granderson · Wilshire Westwood Associates v. Atlantic Richfield Corp. · Cose v. Getty Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the face of uncertainty as to the meaning of what is forbidden, the rule of lenity requires dismissal of count one of the indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.