United States v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis
132 F.3d 504 · 1997
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Munoz (2000), United States v. Martin (2002)
30 federal appellate · 7 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Upjohn Company v. United States · Fisher v. United States · Henderson v. Brown · United States v. Zolin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`fair assurance' that the verdict was not substantially swayed by the error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he attorney-client privilege is, perhaps, the most sacred of all legally recognized privileges, and its preservation is essential to the just and orderly operation of our legal system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.