Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Fla. 526 - Eckles v. State

Eckles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2002 · most notably 136 So. 2d 25 - Banks v. State (1962), State v. Braverman (1977)

31 state decisions

10019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. State · Nickels v. State · Pope v. State · Brown v. State · Casey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Where there is sufficient evidence to raise a doubt as to the sanity of the accused at the time that the plea of guilty was entered, he should, as of right, be allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty, and substitute not guilty. People v. Scott, 59 Cal. 341 ; Deloach v. State, 77 Miss. 691 , 27 So. 618 .’ 16 C.J. 398, note 9 (d). “ ‘The withdrawal of the plea of guilty should not be denied in any case where it is in the least evident that the ends of justice will be subserved by permitting not guilty to be pleaded in its place.’ 16 C.J. 398. “The motion supported by the affidavits at least raises a doubt as to the competency of the accused to enter a plea of guilty without advice of counsel ; and as there was no undue delay in presenting the motion for leave to withdraw the plea of guilty and to go to trial on a plea of not guilty, it was error to deny the motion. See People v. Scott, 59 Cal. 341 ; Leloach v. State, 77 Miss. 691 , 27 So. 618 . The judgment is reversed for appropriate proceedings.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.