Jackson v. Rapps’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2013
3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 656 (§ 456 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Holmes v. United States · Emmons v. United States · Donaldson v. Pillsbury Co. · Wright v. Stone Container Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll non-custodial parents whose children receive or have received AFDC payments through the state of Missouri pursuant to the post-1984 amended statute, Mo.Rev. Stat. § 454.465, whose support obligations have not been established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, and whose "state debt" was set by the Director of [DCSE] without consideration of the formula mandated by 45 C.F.R. § 302.50 and 45 C.F.R. § 302.53 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“payment of public assistance by [DSCE]... creates an obligation, to be called'state debt, ' which is due and owing to the division... in an amount equal to the amount of public assistance so paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was set by the Director of [DCSE] without consideration of the formula mandated by 45 C.F.R. § 302.50 and 45”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.