Terrestrial Systems, Inc. v. Fenstemaker’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1912 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Pavelic v. Marvel Entertainment Group · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. of Phila. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. · Ramos v. Lamm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that to the best of the signer’s knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.