132 F. Supp. 2d 57 - Doe v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (§ 170101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Paul v. Davis · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Wisconsin v. Constantineau · Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has made no determination that any individual included in the Registry is currently dangerous,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the registry suggests that plaintiff is currently dangerous,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“There can be no doubt that Internet availability of registry information is rationally related to the goals of public safety and law enforcement. Indeed, use of the Internet is the most efficient means of making the information available to residents of the state, and it will become more efficient as Internet accessibility increases over time. Because use of the Internet furthers these non-punitive purposes, this feature of the [statute] is insufficient to render the statute punitive in fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.