Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Ga. App. 568 - Ruff v. State

132 Ga. App. 568 - Ruff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1987
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. Willis · Tiller v. State · 122 Ga. App. 21 - Carter v. State · Hooks v. THE STATE · Conoway v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The ruling [of dismissal] on the motion for new trial absolutely decides adversely to movant each and every ground of said motion for new trial, leaving the judgment on the verdict as the law of the case... None of the grounds of the motion for new trial can be considered, the law of the case being established thereon.” This follows Munn v. Kelliam, 228 Ga. 395 ( 185 SE2d 766 ) where it was held:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.