132 Ill. App. 2d 998 - People v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1974
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Giles v. State of Maryland · 114 Ill. App. 2d 230 - People v. Crawford · 83 Ill. App. 2d 402 - People v. Hall · People v. Murphy · 83 Ill. App. 2d 231 - People v. Hoagland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is nothing to show that defendants did not have ample opportunity to investigate and examine the witnesses in advance of trial if they had desired to do so. There is, also, nothing to show lack of cooperation from the standpoint of witnesses. Similarly, there is nothing in the record which shows that the attorney for defendants was foreclosed or limited in his time or opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.