132 Ind. App. 630 - Bone v. Bone’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It is true, as contended by appellant, that where each of the married parties have committed a matrimonial offense which is a cause for divorce, when one seeks this remedy the trial court will not grant either party a divorce. In this case the trial court, by its judgment, presumably determined this condition did not exist. We cannot overrule its finding without weighing the evidence. This we are not permitted to do. Sostheim v. Sostheim (1941), 218 Ind. 352 , 32 N. E. 2d 699 .” See also, Bone v. Bone (1962), 132 Ind. App. 630 , 179 N. E. 2d 584 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hill v. Hill · 136 Ind. App. 275 - Woodcox v. Woodcox

2. ““We shall consider the evidence most favorable to appellee to determine whether or not the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom support the finding that appellant was guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment toward appellee. If there is any substantial evidence of probative value to sustain the finding and decision of the trial court, the judgment must be affirmed. Mitchell v. Mitchell (1956), 126 Ind. App. 377 , 133 N. E. 2d 79 ; Poore v. Poore (1955), 125 Ind. App. 392 , 125 N. E. 2d 810 ."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Scott v. Scott · 136 Ind. App. 283 - Von Pein v. Von Pein