Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Md. App. 250 - Brown v. State

132 Md. App. 250 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2021

2 district · 13 state decisions

110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Estelle v. Williams · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Holbrook v. Flynn · Maryland v. Dyson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One of the core protections of the Fourth Amendment is the warrant requirement. There is, however, a lesser expectation of privacy associated with automobiles and, because they are inherently mobile, a warrantless search of a vehicle is permitted under certain circumstances. “If a car is readily mobile and probable cause exists to believe it contains contraband, the Fourth Amendment ... permits police to search the vehicle without more.” This exception was derived from Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 , 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925), and has since been referred to as the “Carroll doctrine.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County erred in refusing to suppress evidence obtained from a car that was located and seized in Washington, D.C., transported to Maryland, and searched by police pursuant to a Prince George’s County search warrant, where the removal of a car from the District of Columbia was done without the owner’s permission or the cooperation of Washington, D.C., authorities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.