Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 ME 94 - Corthell v. Summit Thread Co.

Corthell v. Summit Thread Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2020

4 federal appellate · 5 district · 12 state decisions

701933194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There is no more settled rule of law applicable to actions based on contracts than that an agreement, in order to be binding, must be sufficiently definite to enable the Court to determine its exact meaning and fix exactly the legal liability of the parties. Indefiniteness may relate to the time of performance, the price to be paid, work to be done, property to be transferred, or other miscellaneous stipulations of the agreement. If the contract makes no statement as to the price to be paid, the law invokes the standard of reasonableness, and the fair value of the services or property is recoverable. If the terms of the agreement are uncertain as to price, but exclude the supposition that a reasonable price was intended, no contract can arise.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a reservation to either party of an unlimited right to determine the nature and extent of his performance renders his obligation too indefinite for legal enforcement, making it, as it is termed, merely illusory”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was to be interpreted in good faith on the basis of what is reasonable and intended, and not technically,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.