Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 N.C. App. 401 - Wells v. Wells

132 N.C. App. 401 - Wells v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 139 N.C. App. 778 - Gaunt v. Pittaway (2000), 178 N.C. App. 251 - Squires v. Squires (2006)

26 state decisions

180199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hall · 131 N.C. App. 242 - First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co. · Matter of Estate of Adamee · 85 N.C. App. 138 - Allred v. Tucci · 10 N.C. App. 457 - Brandon v. Brandon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the intent to appeal an intermediate interlocutory order 'is quite clear from the record,' such order may be reviewed upon appeal of a final judgment notwithstanding failure of said order to be 'specifically mentioned in the notice of appeal [.]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he purpose[] of postseparation support [] [is] to function almost as a stop-gap measure to provide some support to a dependent spouse prior to the discovery of the data necessary for an alimony . . . hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Plaintiff's notice of hearing served upon defendant indicated the matter at issue was plaintiff's PSS motion and that one hour was the estimated time of hearing. Defendant neither filed nor served upon plaintiff any corresponding notice to hear or request for trial of his specific performance action. Indeed, the matter was not placed on a trial calendar, but rather the `Monday Motion Session of the District Court,' presumably limited to the hearing of motions. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.