Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 NEB 303 - Weidenfeld v. Olson

Weidenfeld v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 1963
most recently cited

1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1963

1 district · 8 state decisions

401937194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fitzgerald ex rel. Stockholders of the Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. · Security Savings Bank v. Rhodes · Norman v. Waite · S. Spiegal & Son v. Alpirn · Schuster v. North American Hotel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the statement in a written instrument as to the consideration is more than a mere statement of fact or acknowledgment of the payment of a money consideration, and is of a contractual nature, parol or extrinsic evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the consideration expressed. “The rule that parol evidence is admissible to prove that contemporaneously with, or preliminary to, the execution of a written contract the parties entered into a distinct oral agreement on some collateral matter or as a condition on which the performance of the written contract is to depend, does not apply where the written contract is complete in itself and unambiguous, and where it expresses a contractual consideration.” Spiegal & Son v. Alpirn, 107 Neb. 233 , 185 N. W. 415 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.