Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 N.M. 544 - State v. Frank

State v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
2
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2010), State v. Romero (2006)

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 35 state decisions

210200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153

Relies on United States v. Felipe Sandoval · Nagy v. United States · United States v. McGowan · United States v. Sam Pelican · Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States ..., and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a limited category of Indian lands that are neither reservations nor allotments.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is the land in question, and not merely the Indian tribe inhabiting it, that must be under the superintendence of the Federal Government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.