State v. Roybal’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
100 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Bernal (2006), State v. Paredez (2004)
100 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Woodward · State v. Gonzales · Lytle v. Jordan · State v. Baca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an ineffective assistance claim is first raised on direct appeal, we evaluate the facts that are part of the record. If facts necessary to a full determination are not part of the record, an ineffective assistance claim is more properly brought through a habeas corpus petition, although an appellate court may remand a case for an evidentiary hearing if the defendant makes a prima facie case of ineffective assistance.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barela · State v. Lopez“[M]ere evidentiary prejudice is not enough. Counsel's deficient performance must represent so serious a failure of the adversarial process that it undermines judicial confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the outcome.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne · State v. Quinones“The doctrine of cumulative error applies when multiple errors, which by themselves do not constitute reversible error, are so serious in the aggregate that they cumulatively deprive the defendant of a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TURRIETTA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.