Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 N.M. 756 - State v. Desnoyers

State v. Desnoyers’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Forbes (2005), State v. Torres (2005)

43 state decisions

240200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Bagley · Edwards v. Arizona · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, the principles of double jeopardy do not prohibit retrying a defendant, even over the defendant's objections, after a mistrial that was justified by manifest necessity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for the same offense. U.S. Const. amend. V ; N.M. Const. art. II, § 15.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.