132 Ohio App. 3d 791
726 N.E.2d 554
Decided March 23, 1999
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1999-03-23
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-03-23
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2023
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 dissenting.
¶2 ■ I respectfully dissent. I believe that the bonding company’s inability to return Defendant Sexton to Ohio emanates from the defendant’s incarceration in South Carolina. Consequently, at this stage of the proceedings I believe that good cause exists to excuse the bonding company’s failure to produce the defendant.