Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Okla. 169 - Johnson v. Render

Johnson v. Render’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri Kansas Texas Pailway Company v. Sallie C Wulf · Old Dominion Copper Mining Smelting Company v. Frederick Lewisohn · Davis v. Las Ovas Co. · Mack v. . Latta · Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fraud complained of was against the plaintiff, Render, individually, was a breach of duty under the original agreement between him and the defendants .... The fraud arose from a misrepresentation as to the payment of a bonus whereby plaintiff was induced to pay a sum of money not in accord with and in violation of their original agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.