Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 P3D 609 - Davis v. Addy

Davis v. Addy’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2022

5 state decisions

30200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc. · Wilson v. Kane · Lowrance v. Patton · In Re Estate of Holcomb · Norman v. Trison Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A judgment or order is facially void when the face of the record reveals one of the three elements of jurisdiction was absent, i.e., jurisdiction over the parties, jurisdiction over the subject matter, or jurisdictional power to pronounce the particular decision that was entered, is shown to have been absent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “summary judgment is not an authority or power granted to the trial court by the probate code,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he probate code does not provide for summary or partial summary adjudication,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.