Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 PACOMMW 605 - Strickland v. Commonwealth

Strickland v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 276 Pa. Super. 209 - Shuman Estate v. Weber · 108 Pa. Commw. 199 - PennDOT v. MIDAS MUFFLER SHOP · Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Stahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Assignment of points. If the station owner, manager, supervisor or other management level employe was without knowledge of the violation, the Department may permit the station owner to consent to the acceptance of a point assessment for the station in lieu of suspension. (1) The station owner bears the burden of proving that the station owner provided proper supervision of the employe who committed the violation, but that the owner’s supervision could not have prevented the violation. (2) By accepting the assessment of points the station owner waives the right to appeal the Department’s determination in the case to a court of record. If the station owner refuses to accept the point assessment, the Department will issue the suspension provided in this chapter for the offense committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.