132 Pa. Super. 431 - Hoff v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2014 · most notably Gibson v. Callaghan (1999), 151 Cal. App. 2d 775 - Cal-Farm Insurance v. Boisseranc (1957)
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bair v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[njeither [blood] relationship nor the presence of all the parties within one dwelling is the determining factor, but rather the existence of such domestic arrangements and circumstances as would create separate domestic establishments, each having its own head and separate management.” (Emphasis added.)”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.