Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 SCT 641 - Gonzalez v. Thaler

Gonzalez v. Thaler’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

446
cited by 446 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

146 federal appellate · 40 district · 13 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedGonzalez v. Thaler (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2101 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Foman v. Davis · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 446 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy [that] showing.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(1) Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from— (A) the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court; or (B) the final order in a proceeding under section 2255. (2) A certificate of appealability may issue under paragraph (1) only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (3)The certificate of appealability under paragraph (1) shall indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy the showing required by paragraph (2).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.