Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 So. 2d 312 - Daniel v. State

132 So. 2d 312 - Daniel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Presley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although it is essential that law enforcement officers be protected from violence by the lawless, nevertheless in order to avail themselves of the protection which the law affords them they must make known their official capacity before exercising the prerogative of arrest with the attendant assault. Upon thus making themselves known, they then come within the protection of the law, and a citizen is thereupon bound to submit, at least to the point of. ascertaining the character of the charge and the extent of the officer’s authority.” (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.