132 So. 3d 1069 - Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · Williams v. State · 549 So. 2d 949 - Keyes v. State · 58 So. 3d 59 - Mitchell v. State · Thomas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it is correct that the date of the judgment is not specifically stated in the indictment, all of the information that is contained, and specifically the cause number, afforded the defendant access to the date of the judgment. This Court holds that information pertaining to the date of the judgment was substantially set forth in the indictment and that suf- fícient information was afforded the defendant to inform him of the specific prior convictions upon which the State relied for enhanced punishment to comply with due process. The purpose of the above rule is fulfilled....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Small v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.