Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 SO3D 841 - Smith v. Time Customer Services

Smith v. Time Customer Services’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 760 So. 2d 126 - Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach · 59 So. 2d 40 - Gordon v. Gordon · Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lambert · McClain v. State · Spears v. Albertson's, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The piecemeal nature of workers’ compensation does not preclude application of res judicata. However, this principle only applies when the elements of res judicata are present and the doctrine properly applied.... The determining factor in deciding whether the cause of action is the same is whether the facts or evidence necessary to maintain the suit are the same in both actions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.