Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

132 So. 3d 903

Sinclair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 2014

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on 878 So. 2d 1236 - Baker v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of prohibition is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). As we have recognized previously, the petitioner has brought the claim raised herein before this court repeatedly, and it has been considered and rejected by this court at least four times over the past year alone.1 Accordingly, we direct the clerk of the court to forward a copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution with the Department of Corrections for consideration of disciplinary measures against the petitioner pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes.

¶2The petitioner is warned that any future frivolous filings in this court may result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including but not limited to a prohibition on any further pro se filings relating to the sentence imposed in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2000-CF-9964-AXXX.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

¶3. In case numbers 1D13-0762, 1D13-1416, and 1D13-5285, this court affirmed the trial court's denials of the petitioner’s postconviction motions which raised the issue he asserts herein. In case number ID 13-4813, this court dismissed a habeas corpus petition raising the same issue and referred the petition to the Department of Corrections for potential sanctions against the petitioner pursuant to section 944.279(1), Florida Statutes.

/132/so3d/903 · .json · Public domain