Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

132 So. 3d 924

Rushing v. Rushing

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 2014

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-02-17

Relies on Scott Ex Rel. Scott v. WOMEN'S MED. GROUP, PA

Decided 2014-02-17

PER CURIAM.

¶1This appeal is from an Order Denying Petitioner/Former Wife’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees for Defense of Foreclosure Actions and an Order Denying Petitioner/Former Wife’s Motion to Require Respondent/Former Husband to Pay Contempt Fine. We dismiss the portion of the appeal pertaining to the first order, as it contemplates further judicial review and is therefore outside our jurisdiction. See Scott v. Women’s Med. Gr. PA, 837 So.2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We affirm the second order without discussion.

¶2DISMISSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.

THOMAS and RAY, JJ., concur. WETHERELL, J., concurs in result.
/132/so3d/924 · .json · Public domain