132 Tex. Crim. 427
104 S.W.2d 872
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 24, 1937
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1937-03-24
<p>The opinion states the case.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1937-03-24
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1979
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 ON MOTION FOE REHEARING.
¶2 — In his motion for rehearing the appellant re-asserts the contention that the offense which he committed was swindling and not theft. The evidence and the remarks embraced in the original opinion are regarded as properly supporting the conclusion reached with reference to the disposition of the appeal.
¶3 The motion for rehearing is overruled.
¶4 Overruled.