Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 U.S. 118 - Hill v. Sumner

Hill v. Sumner’s Empirical Analysis

132 U.S. 118 · 1889

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

5018891890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nichols Assignee v. Eaton et al. · Phelps v. Harris · United States v. Gratiot · Nunez v. Dautel · Rogers v. Goodwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The expression `to dispose of' is very broad, and signifies more than ` to sell'.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.