Marchand v. Emken’s Empirical Analysis
132 U.S. 195 · 1889
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1961 · most notably Hill v. Wooster (1890), Lovell Manuf'G Co v. Cary (1893)
11 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richmond v. Irons · Hollister v. Benedict Burnham Manuf'G · Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Chicago & Alton Railroad · Dreyfus v. Searle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is here no sufficient foundation upon which to rest a claim which, if construed, as broadly as the complainant insists it should he, practically makes all pay tribute who stir the mixture in question by machinery, and by hand also, provided substantially the saimj movement can be produced by hand-stirring, and this seems to be a disputed question upon the proof”— citing Hollister v. Benedict Mfg. Co., 113 U. S. 59 , 72, 5 Sup. Ct. 717 , 28 L. Ed. 901 ; Dreyfus v. Searle, 124 U. S. 60 , 8 Sup. Ct. 390 , 31 L. Ed. 352 ; Crescent Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, 128 U. S. 158 , 9 Sup. Ct. 83 , 32 L. Ed. 390 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.