Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 U.S. 201 - Royer v. Roth

Royer v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis

132 U.S. 201 · 1889

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1963
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1963 · most notably Hill v. Wooster (1890), Lovell Manuf'G Co v. Cary (1893)

22 federal appellate · 8 district ·

200188918901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron Works · Thatcher Heating Co. v. Burtis · Double-Pointed Tack Co. v. Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. · Clark Pomace-Holder Co v. Ferguson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In combination with the drum, A, of a rawhide fulling machine operating to twist the leather alternately in one direction and the other, a shifting device for the purpose of making the operation, automatic and continuous,' substantially as described.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.