Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 U.S. 27 - Jackson v. Allen

Jackson v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

132 U.S. 27 · 1889

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
15
cited 15 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions (15 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2000 · most notably Powers v. Chesapeake O Ry Co (1898), Gerling v. Baltimore Ohio R Co (1894)

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

3801889189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. · Stevens v. Nichols · Knox County v. Harshman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears from the record that the citizenship of the parties at the commencement of the actions as well as at the time the petitions for removal were filed was not sufficiently shown, and that, therefore, the jurisdiction of the state court was never divested. This being so, the defect cannot be cured by amendment.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““That where a suit is entered upon the docket of a circuit court as removed on the ground of the diverse citizenship of the parties, and was never in law removed, no amendment of the record made in the circuit court can affect the jurisdiction of the state court, or put the case rightfully on the docket of the circuit court as of the date when it was so docketed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.