Ewing v. Haas’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1997
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States · State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of Education · Moses v. Julian · Forest Coal Co. v. Doolittle · North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. Keyser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Affiant believes, by reason thereof, (the presiding judge) is not now in the unbiased position which under the law, a judge should occupy in presiding at the trial of this case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.