Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Vt. 369 - State v. Barrett

State v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
8
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably State v. Bruyette (1992), State v. Doucette (1983)

44 state decisions

23019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States · Roviaro v. United States · McCray v. State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The purpose of the search of the informer and his being escorted to the place of purchase was to eliminate *Page 133 both as much as possible of the hearsay aspects of the search warrant request and to reduce the reliance on”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he “basis of knowledge” test... is not concerned with the integrity or veracity of the informant, but with the actual source of the information from which the magistrate is to be drawing his conclusion as to probable cause. Is it the direct sensory perception of the informer, or is he merely repeating someone else’s conclusion? To pass muster, the informant must transmit the factual basis for the conclusions, so that the magistrate may make his own direct analysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.