¶1 (concurring) — I concur in the foregoing opinion on the following grounds: first, that the building restrictions had been habitually violated before appellants bought their property; and, second, because they are estopped by their conduct to complain.
132 Wash. 345
232 P 283
Ronberg v. Smith
Decided January 9, 1925
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1925-01-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-01-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1994
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →