Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 WASH2D 54 - State v. Becker

State v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2012 · most notably Uttecht v. Brown (2007), State v. Tili (1999)

28 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc. · Knapp v. United States · 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States · 114 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Swan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`within 1000 feet of the perimeter of school grounds, to-wit: Youth Employment Education Program School at the time of the commission of the crime?'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It may be unrealistic, of course to expect drug dealers to take these steps, but that is irrelevant to the question whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague. The defendants' failure to have been aware of the law and to have taken action to protect themselves against the enhanced penalty for their criminal conduct is no basis for declaring the statute unconstitutionally vague.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “requirement contained in the statute's definition of school. RCW 69.50.435(f)(1). The record here shows that other means of readily ascertaining the location of YEP were available to Becker and Gantt. They could have called the Seattle School District regarding YEP. Had they looked at the Alaska Building's directory, they would have seen the entry”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.