State v. L.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Arizona v. Fulminante · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · 101 Wash. 2d 612 - State v. Acosta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“State v. Camarillo, 115 Wash.2d 60, 71 , 794 P.2d 850 (1990). The trial court found that there was no evidence J.G. possessed a gun the day of the assault, that L.B.'s approach to J.G. negated a reasonable belief that his safety was threatened, and that his action after hitting J.G. negated a good faith belief that he was threatened by J.G. The trial court concluded that L.B.'s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. LB“use of force was not lawful because he had no reasonable belief that he was about to be injured by J.G.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. LB“Thus, the trial court found no threat of injury; it did not find only that there was no threat of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. LB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.