Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 Wis. 2d 351 - State v. Hahn

132 Wis. 2d 351 - State v. Hahn’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 189 Wis. 2d 59 - State v. Greenwold (1994), 145 Wis. 2d 724 - State v. Schmitt (1988)

24 state decisions

8019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · California v. Trombetta · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “truck had an apparent exculpatory value which the state recognized, evidenced by its impoundment of the vehicle,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Defendant's truck had an apparent exculpatory value which the state recognized, evidenced by its impoundment of the vehicle. [Wlhen the sheriffs department told defendant that his truck had been impounded, he had no reason to believe that any action he might take regarding the vehicle, such as signing its title, would affect the impoundment. While defendant's act of signing the truck's title may have initiated a chain of events which resulted in the destruction of his truck, defendant's action has no relationship to the state's duty to preserve evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.