Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 ALA 112 - Scott v. State

Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
August 1973
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1973

15 state decisions

6019011910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · Johnson v. State · Thornton v. State · Long v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The state certainly has no interest and the defendant has no right to introduce into the jury box unfit persons. It is the duty of the court to guard against their introduction.” (Italics ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.